Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

2
Nov

Obama Wants to Bankrupt Coal Industry

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies, Energy

Thanks to P.J. Gladnick, at Newsbusters:

Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview:

“Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

It’s just that it will bankrupt them.

Had the Press actually been doing it’s job this election cycle, things like this would not be news to the public.

Audio recording is available here:

Tags: ,

29
Oct

The Second Bill of Rights

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies, Economics, National

(Hat tip to Scott at Powerline)

The Toledo Blade has some pieces on Obama, and FDR’s Second Bill of Rights.

Without further ado, here is that list of “rights” that the left want to append to the Constitution:

  • The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or
    shops or farms or mines of the nation;
  • The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing
    and recreation;
  • The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a
    return which will give him and his family a decent living;
  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an
    atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by
    monopolies at home or abroad;
  • The right of every family to a decent home;
  • The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to
    achieve and enjoy good health;
  • The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old
    age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
  • The right to a good education.

Amazingly, this list shares many common points with the UN Declaration on Human Rights, which I have commented on before.

And I have the same general comment – everything listed here is a Benefit, not a Right.

Benefit: 

Something that promotes or enhances well-being; an advantage: The field trip was of great benefit to the students; Help; aid.

Right:
Something that is due to a person or governmental body by law, tradition, or nature.

Your Rights are yours from birth.  No one has the power to give them to you, though they can easily be taken from you, with or without your consent.

The first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Original Bill of Rights, does not grant your rights, or even enumerate them.  It specifically prohibits the government from infringing upon several of them, that the Founders thought so fundamental that they needed to be named, including the practice of Religion, Defense, Security from the state in your person and personal effects, protection from government and judicial abuse, and most importantly, in the 9th and 10th amendments, from the Government itself.

  • Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the
states respectively, or to the people.

To reiterate,  the 9th amendment specifically states that the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are not the only rights.  The 10th amendment specifically limits the Federal government to the powers granted in the Constitution, and reserves all others to the states and people.

What the Second Bill of Rights would do is to grant Benefits.  Benefits guaranteed by the Government.  And anything granted by the state is controlled by the state, can be taken away by the state, and makes you subservient to the state.  You cannot have a benefit from the state without losing some portion of your inalienable rights.

The most insidious of the items on FDR’s list is the first.  When the State guarantees you a job, you no longer owe your allegiance to your employer, but to the state.  We see that in the Union workforce today.  Union members owe their allegiance to their Union.  The employer is almost immaterial to them.  I have known Union members in the construction industry who are dispatched to different companies, almost as though the Union was a skilled labor pool agency.  The Contractor they work for varies as projects come and go.  This amendment would destroy the worker/employer relationship throughout the economy (more than likely by making Union membership mandatory), with the State being the ultimate arbiter.

This would also have the effect of transferring control of all business to the State; since the State would be the guarantor of jobs, they would certainly move to require levels of benefits and employee (Union) representation in management.

If all this sounds somewhat familiar, it is the model followed by many failed states, most notably the Soviet Union.

Sounds good for the worker, though, right?

Well, the cost will be the loss of your right to choose where you work, who you work for, and your ability to negotiate your own compensation and job benefits. Companies will be bound to offer standardized pay and bennies for comparable work.  You will, in essence, be like the Union worker, at the Union Hall, taking the next job on the list that more or less fits your skill set.

Most of the items on the Second Bill of Rights flow from or are linked to guaranteed employment.

Of the others, two demand further discussion:

  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an
    atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by
    monopolies at home or abroad

A monopoly at home is only possible when a) the government grants it, or b) when a company has sole control of a resource (or technology) to create a product or service.  The second instance can usually be overcome by countries from outside the state.  The first instance is very easily remedied.  Stop creating government monopolies (for example, Cable and Power, and other Utility companies are usually granted monopolies pn products and services in specific areas).

Free trade makes monopolies difficult, if not impossible, aside from government action to create them.

  • The right of every family to a decent home

Ever seen Public Housing? 

There is a basic rule of human nature, that cannot be simply wished away:  People do not appreciate things that they are given, as the appreciate things that they work for.

When the state gives you a home, it is the state’s home.  You are just allowed to live there.  You have no incentive to care for the home, and the state makes the rules governing how you live in the home. 

————————————–
What the entire Second Bill of Rights does is turn a society based on Freedom and self-determination, into a society of dependent proles.

When the state cares for you from cradle to grave (or womb to the tomb, if you prefer), your are no longer free; you are a servant to the state.  The Government Of the People, For the People, and By the People, becomes the Government of, for, and by the Bureaucrat and the Political aristocracy.

When the state guarantees your job, your home, your food and clothing, your health care, your retirement, and your education, the payback will be the loss of your ability to choose these things for yourself, and the ability to improve your lot. 

We have seen this movie before.  Look at any of the countries of Eastern Europe that suffered under the yoke of Socialist domination for the last half of the 20th century.  That is the future of America if we fail to learn the lessons of history, and condemn ourselves and our children to repeat it.

Even the Chinese have learned this lesson. And as the state recedes from peoples daily lives, their economy and opportunities grow exponentially.  As economic freedom continues to grow, political freedom will follow.

It is sad to think that many in this country have lost the will strive ahead, and now want to fall back into the cold comfort of serfdom.

Tags: , ,

27
Oct

The Left Wing Likes to Get Them Young

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies

This election cycle has brought us such scenes as camo wearing teens, in formation, crying out that “Because of Obama” they can have a career and a future; small children singing Obama’s praises, bringing to mind similar spectacles in praise of Kim Jong Il in North Korea, or Fidel Castro in Cuba.

The left loves the imagery of Youth, almost as they love to take advantage of the inexperience and gullibility of the young.

Now, Obama is trying to enlist kids to convince their parents and grandparents to vote for the Obamessiah:

The site has helpful hints, like “Do’s and Don’ts”;

Don’t worry about knowing everything about policy positions before you have this conversation;

Don’t wait until the last minute — it might take a few conversations for you to convince them, so start as early as possible;

…and “Ideas to get the conversation started”:

Share Barack’s speech from the Democratic National Convention or Meet Barack, a video about who Barack Obama is, where he comes from, and what his values are.

Email them and tell them why it’s important to you that they vote for Obama.

And a special note for kids whose Parent’s aren’t already (or leaning to becoming) Obamatons:

Think about their perspective. If they are Republican, or are concerned about Barack’s policies, think about where they are coming from and what makes them think the way that they do.

And remember:

Are you sure if your parents are voting for Obama?

If not, you may be the only person who can convince them. If you haven’t already, it’s time for you to have “The Talk” with your parents and other family members.

And tell all your friends to do the same!

The site then ticks off some bullet points:

Affordable Higher Education

Barack will create a new American Opportunity Tax Credit to make the first $4,000 of college completely free for most students. In return, eligible students will be required to perform 100 hours of public service a year.

$4000 for 100 hours work? That’s $40 an hour! But, if you have to spend 100 hours working for it, is it really free?

Health Care

Barack is committed to health care reform that ensures all Americans have high-quality, affordable health care choices. He will ensure that young adults can stay covered under their parents’ insurance until age 25, to help reduce costs for young people entering the workforce.

But no word on what said coverage will cost them, or their parents.

Jobs

Barack supports doubling federal funding for basic research, expanding broadband access, and making the research and development tax credit permanent so that young people with and without college degrees can thrive in the job market. Barack will invest $150 billion in renewable energy projects to create up to 5 million new jobs, and will create an energy-focused youth jobs program to give more young Americans a good job opportunity.

If you could create 5 Million jobs by just spending $150 Billion, then why not spend $300 Billion and create 10 million jobs?  Can’t we just spend enough money to make sure everyone has a job?  Of course, the scary answer is:  Yes, if you take enough money from people that have it, you can create make-work for people that don’t.  Unfortunately, it is a temporary solution:  Once the money is gone, the people you took from have no incentive to make any more, and the well runs dry…

Iraq and Foreign Affairs

Barack opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning and has a plan to responsibly end the war. He will renew American diplomacy by reaching out to foreign leaders and will reestablish America’s moral leadership by respecting civil liberties and fighting corruption at home. Barack will continue to lead the global fight against HIV/AIDS, double U.S. funding for foreign aid, and work to end the genocide in Sudan.

Obama’s plan for ending the Iraq war is the same as the Democrat plan to end the war in VietNam.  Declare victory, pull out, and ignore the Iraqis when they are overrun by Iranian backed guerrilas and terrorists.

The standard Democrat version of foreign policy is to kneel to the United Nations, buddy up with bloody handed left wing dictators, and generally cede our sovereignty to any international NGO knocking around with an issue. 

Oh, and Obama will spread more of your tax money around to countried with leaders that hate us, trying to buy their favor.

Engage America’s Youth in Politics

Barack believes we cannot improve our government without involving young Americans in the political process. He supports measures that would make it easier for young people to vote, such as Election-Day registration and no-excuse absentee balloting.

Translation:  Make it easier to stuff the ballot box. 

Global Warming

Barack has been a leader in the fight to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize the effects of climate change on our planet. He strongly supports a market-based, cap-and-trade approach that will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

The Cap and Trade system is, like sub-prime mortgages, a system rife with potential for abuse and corruption.  And the idea that greenhosue gas emission can be cut by 80% in 42 years, just by the force of a cap and trade system is ludicrous.  Short of the implementation of Nuclear power on a massive scale, there is no alternative to the consumption of fossil fuels in the near future.

Besides, now that we are heading into a cooling cycle, we might think about whether cutting back too far on C02 emmissions is really such a bright idea…

So, here is my suggestion, if your kids try to wheedle you into voting for Chairman Obamao:

-Discuss politics with your children, and explain what brought you to your political stance, and what you believe in.

-Broaden their horizons, by explaining that, despite what they are taught in school, History did not start in 1988, when Bill Clinton was elected.  Spend a lot of time talking about Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.

-Talk about morals and ethics – which Political Party has them, and which one doesn’t.  Give examples.

-Discuss economics.  Use examples they can understand.  Use real world examples like North Korea, Cuba, India, China, and the US.

-Discuss Rights, Responsibilites, and Benefits; and the difference between them.

-Discuss that Freedom is impossible without a Free Economy (Capitalism), and that State control of the Economy limits your freedom.

-Discuss the difference between holding a politcal position that you can logically defend, and one that is solely supported by emotion and feelings.

Always remember that you can’t argue someone out of something that they haven’t been argued into.  It’s OK to be passionate, but it’s never good to lose you temper, or allow political differences to cloud personal relationships.

***********************************
Do I really think that Obama is trying to form a new Hitler Youth type movement?  Probably not.

But if I had to pick between Obama and McCain, as to which one was more likely to do exactly that – there is no question that it would be Obama.

Tags:

24
Oct

Argentina Shows The Way for Obama

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies, Economics

From the WSJ:

When the Argentine government ran out of money in 2001, it blamed the market and increased its own role in the economy. Since then it has imposed price controls, defaulted on its debt, seized dollar bank accounts, devalued the currency, nationalized businesses and tried to set confiscatory tax rates with the aim of making society more “fair.”

That last part sounds a LOT like the Change championed by the Obamessiah, doesn’t it?  And Maxine Waters (S D -Cal) has already threatened nationalization (though she couldn’t remember the word) of the Oil industry.  And the very people who caused our market crisis are intruding more and more into the financial sector.

Among emerging market investors Argentina is now considered one of the worst places on the planet to put your money. Now that commodity prices are cooling and the global economy is slowing, (Argentine President) Mrs. (Cristina) Kirchner is facing a $10 billion shortfall in what is due on government debt by the end of 2009. Where else to turn but to the resources of the private sector? Argentina, if little else, serves as a cautionary tale on how to ruin an economy.

And yet, with the example Argentina staring them right in the face, the Socialist lemming march unerringly towards the cliff, singing “Obama’s gonna Change it…”

Tags: , ,

In the death throes of the Roman Republic, there were a series of Triumvirates formed – three people sharing total power between them.  The first, and most famous, was formed by Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey.

In America today, we face a Triumvirate of Barak Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi.

And their minion are already scurrying around, letting their imaginations run riot on what elements of America they can Change.

Ed Morrissey at Hot Air
has a piece concerning plans to overhaul, and effectively eliminate the 401(k) system, from Workforce.Com:

Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.

House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-California, and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Washington, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.

Of course, Social Security was supposed to be exactly that – a guaranteed account with mandatory contributions.  The 401(k) system has always been voluntary, as is the degree of participation.  And employer contributions have become a major tool of employers to recruit and maintain quality employees.

The plan being considered would require workers to put 5% of their gross income into a Government bonds that would pay 3% per year.  To offset the cost for low income earners, the plan would give every worker a $600 annual subsidy.

And what, exactly, is the object of the exercise:  For the $3 Trillion currently invested in 401(k) accounts to be poured into Government Bonds, to subsidize the national debt.  Oh, and as a plus, to eliminate $80 Billion in annual tax breaks for 401(k) investors.

And the way they are going to justify this money grab?

At that hearing, the director of the Congressional Budget Office, Peter Orszag, testified that some $2 trillion in
retirement savings has been lost over the past 15 months.

So, the Government engineered housing and credit crash, which has now rippled through the stock market, is the justification for nationalizing the last control you have over your retirement.

“This is a battle between liberalism and conservatism,” said Christopher Van Slyke, a partner in the La Jolla, California, advisory firm Trovena, which manages $400 million. “People are afraid because their accounts are seeing some volatility, so Democrats will seize on the opportunity to attack a program where investors control their own destiny,” he said.

Oh, and don’t forget that you are already paying 6.2% of your gross income into Social Security (which pays an average of 2%, assuming the system stays solvent).  Now you can add another 5% for the new Retirement Bond program.  So now, 11.2% of your gross pay is gone, right off the top, plus the 1.45% employee contribution into Medicare, means that you are now going to be handing over 12.65% of your gross pay over to the Federal Government. And you have NO SAY in any of it.

Also, this hurts employers and workers, by taking away a system which has allowed employers to offer matching funds for employee contributions into 401(k) accounts.  It will make it harder for employers to recruit and retain quality employees, and will cost employees the monies that their employers formerly contributed into their retirement accounts.

The only one who wins in this scenario is the Federal Government.

And the Triumvirate that controls it.


Tags: , ,

Courtesy ABC News:

“Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the
second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six
months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy.
The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old
senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it
standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re
gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the
mettle of this guy.”

Because Obama has no “street-cred” in Foreign Policy… Or Crisis Management… Or Military Affairs…  But he does know how to organize a community!

“I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might
originate,” Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the
Middle East and Russia as possibilities. “And he’s gonna need help. And
the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not
financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence,
your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s
not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re
right.”

This from a man who hasn’t been right about ANYTHING concerning foreign policy in recent memory.  He’s the guy that thought that the only way to “save” Iraq was to Partition it to separate the Sunni’s, Shiites, and Kurds, because the Surge wouldn’t work…  But that’s only his latest mistake…

“I’ve forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues
know, so I’m not being falsely humble with you. I think I can be value
added, but this guy has it,” the Senate Foreign Relations chairman said
of Obama.

Again, considering Biden’s track record, I’m not sure he should have this high of an opinion of his foreign policy skills.  Nor should he be considered an authoritative source on other peoples FP chops. Lorie Byrd has some of Biden’s more recent FP pronouncements at Townhall.Com.  Donald Douglas has more posted at RealClearPolitics.

“This guy has it. But he’s gonna need your help. Because I promise you,
you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, ‘Oh my God,
why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is
this thing so tough?’ We’re gonna have to make some incredibly tough
decisions in the first two years. So I’m asking you now, I’m asking you
now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this
point because you’re going to have to reinforce us.”

Translation:  We are going to make a hash of this, while we fumble around, but we have a Plan, really…

“We do not have the military capacity, nor have we ever, quite frankly,
in the last 20 years, to dictate outcomes,” he cautioned. “It’s so much
more important than that. It’s so much more complicated than that. And
Barack gets it.”

I quess Biden wasn’t paying attention in 1991, when we moved 500,000 men and their war materials into the Gulf in under 6 months, and spent less than a week crushing the best Arab military force in the region.  Even today, as the Surge proved, we can dictate the outcome.  It’s just a matter of the will to win, which neither Obama or Biden seem to have.

After speaking for just over a quarter of an hour, Biden noticed the media presence in the back of the small ballroom.

“I probably shouldn’t have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here,” he joked.

I wonder what else he would have said, if he hadn’t noticed the press?  Like Obama in San Francisco, the only time they tell the truth is when they think there is no one recording them.

Tags: ,

20
Oct

Did William Ayers Help Obama Write His Book?

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies

Jack Cashill, writing in the WorldNetDaily certainly thinks so:

…there is considerable and growing evidence that Bill Ayers made a significant contribution to Obama’s “Dreams from My Father.”

Among other indicators, I have cited the stunning parallels in nautical metaphors and postmodern themes, as well as the nearly miraculous transformation of Obama from struggling hack to literary giant in just a few years.

Ayers’ involvement in Obama’s memoir is not nearly as improbable as it might sound. Ayers served as something of a literary guru for his radical Hyde Park neighbors in Chicago.

Rashid Khalidi attests to this in the very first sentence of the acknowledgements in his 2004 book, “Resurrecting Empire.”

“There are many people without whose support and assistance I could not have written this book, or written it in the way that it was written,” he writes. “First, chronologically, and in other ways, comes Bill Ayers.”

And it’s obvious that Obama was grateful for the help:

Obama, for instance, wrote a short and glowing review of Ayers’ 1997 book, “A Kind and Just Parent,” for the Chicago Tribune.

Obama, whose photo is shown with the review, describes Ayers’ book as “a searing and timely account of the juvenile court system.”

In that same book, perhaps with a self-congratulatory wink, Ayers cites the “writer” Barack Obama as one among the celebrities in his neighborhood.

And it bears repetition to state exactly why Obama’s relationship with Ayers is important this election season:

What is at issue is that, if my thesis is correct, Obama has maintained
an intimate working relationship with a self-described “communist”
whose actions Obama now calls “despicable” and “detestable” only
because he has to.

Tags: ,

Colin Powell was never a rock-ribbed conservative.

He has always been, at best, a RINO, with positions, overall, very close to John McCain’s.

I’m really not sure why his endorsement of Obama should come as any surprise, given Powell’s estrangement from the Bush administration.

UPDATE:

The other shoe has dropped.  Just good old fashioned Political Patronage…

Colin Powell will have a role as a top presidential adviser in an Obama administration, the Democratic White House hopeful said Monday.

“He will have a role as one of my advisers,” Barack Obama said on NBC’s “Today” in an interview aired Monday, a day after Powell, a four-star general and President Bush‘s former secretary of state, endorsed him.

Tags:

Page 2 of 3123