<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The American Empire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paxamerica.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paxamerica.com</link>
	<description>News and Views From Frederickson Washington</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Shots by Rey</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/07/07/quick-shots/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=129#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>Obama wants people to serve, hoping to reduce drop outs? The idea of doing work while paying to go to college seems terrible enough, but I suppose that's his plan for "free" college.
Moving on to the racist babies, I'm going to just assume that's an Onion News viral add. That's just to much of a joke to comment further.
As much as I agree with you that McCain should be drilling the case for in-house natural resources, I still think choosing the best of the worst, especially with the ability to win with just one case, we should redo our governmental system and rebuild a repaired country.
Finally, as for the democrats working for FARC, is that really news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama wants people to serve, hoping to reduce drop outs? The idea of doing work while paying to go to college seems terrible enough, but I suppose that&#8217;s his plan for &#8220;free&#8221; college.<br />
Moving on to the racist babies, I&#8217;m going to just assume that&#8217;s an Onion News viral add. That&#8217;s just to much of a joke to comment further.<br />
As much as I agree with you that McCain should be drilling the case for in-house natural resources, I still think choosing the best of the worst, especially with the ability to win with just one case, we should redo our governmental system and rebuild a repaired country.<br />
Finally, as for the democrats working for FARC, is that really news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bobby Jindal for President in 2016! by Cindy Brown</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2007/10/21/bobby-jindal-for-president-in-2016/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=85#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>No, but thanks anyway.  I'll find other websites to post news about Louisiana and Gov. Bobby Jindal.  Bonsoir, Cindy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but thanks anyway.  I&#8217;ll find other websites to post news about Louisiana and Gov. Bobby Jindal.  Bonsoir, Cindy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bobby Jindal for President in 2016! by Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2007/10/21/bobby-jindal-for-president-in-2016/#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=85#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>Your 9 previous posts were deleted as Spam.  

I can think of now other word for sending 9 comments,with multiple links, to a 9 month old post.

Feel free to start your own anti-Jindal blog.  You can set one up free at Blogspot or Wordpress.Com.

If you want to discuss the subject of the post (or any other post), I am happy to oblige.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your 9 previous posts were deleted as Spam.  </p>
<p>I can think of now other word for sending 9 comments,with multiple links, to a 9 month old post.</p>
<p>Feel free to start your own anti-Jindal blog.  You can set one up free at Blogspot or Wordpress.Com.</p>
<p>If you want to discuss the subject of the post (or any other post), I am happy to oblige.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bobby Jindal for President in 2016! by Cindy Brown</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2007/10/21/bobby-jindal-for-president-in-2016/#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=85#comment-4309</guid>
		<description>I'm very disappointed that all the postings regarding Gov. Bobby Jindal and the pay raise issue facing the people of Louisiana have been removed.... 
http://www.legewatch.com/....http://forgotston.com/......http://www.bayoubuzz.com/.....http://www.thedeadpelican.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very disappointed that all the postings regarding Gov. Bobby Jindal and the pay raise issue facing the people of Louisiana have been removed&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.legewatch.com/....http://forgotston.com/......http://www.bayoubuzz.com/.....http://www.thedeadpelican.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.legewatch.com/&#8230;.http://forgotston.com/&#8230;&#8230;http://www.bayoubuzz.com/&#8230;..http://www.thedeadpelican.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raise The Age To Vote! by Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/02/28/raise-the-age-to-vote/#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/2008/02/28/raise-the-age-to-vote/#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>Is it completely impossible for Obamatons and their fellow travelers to respond to an issue without trying to change the focus of the argument?  That tactic plays well on TV, but not here.

For what its worth, I only censor obscenity, and spam.  You are welcome to spew whatever irrelevant, and off topic, nonsense you want.

Did you want to attempt to argue the points of the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it completely impossible for Obamatons and their fellow travelers to respond to an issue without trying to change the focus of the argument?  That tactic plays well on TV, but not here.</p>
<p>For what its worth, I only censor obscenity, and spam.  You are welcome to spew whatever irrelevant, and off topic, nonsense you want.</p>
<p>Did you want to attempt to argue the points of the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Man Without A Party by Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/#comment-4307</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4307</guid>
		<description>Sigma:

A - Nixon was a RINO at best; who opened relations with China; but it was Clinton that sold them Weapons tech.

B - I wont comment on the KKK being "Republican", or the Confederates army being Republican.  Please check your facts, and get back to me, as every reference I see contradicts you.

C - There is nothing "moderate" about the modern Democrat party.  They are Marxist at the very, and, I suspect, Stalinist deep down.  Happy to discuss this point with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma:</p>
<p>A - Nixon was a RINO at best; who opened relations with China; but it was Clinton that sold them Weapons tech.</p>
<p>B - I wont comment on the KKK being &#8220;Republican&#8221;, or the Confederates army being Republican.  Please check your facts, and get back to me, as every reference I see contradicts you.</p>
<p>C - There is nothing &#8220;moderate&#8221; about the modern Democrat party.  They are Marxist at the very, and, I suspect, Stalinist deep down.  Happy to discuss this point with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Man Without A Party by Mr. M Sigma</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. M Sigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>And Republicans are perfect? Look at Richard Nixon? Fucking TREASONIST TERRORIST Bastard, that sold weapons to the CHINESE!

He was a FIRM Republican...there goes your argument. Also your argument that the kkk was a wing of the Democratic party is a complete lie. If you knew your history half as well as I do, you'd know that the first KKK was established by veterans of the CONFEDERATE Army, which makes sense considering the Confederate Army was largely Republican.

I, being a Moderate, oddly agree with your views on what the Republican Party SHOULD be, or was. Currently we are looking at a new form of divisive and corrupt politics in BOTH parties, but according to the facts that I just refuted, I look at the current Democratic party as the lesser of two evils.

If the GOP had remained Paleo-Conservative in Nature, I would be a Republican at this very moment, but sadly it's seemed to have gone the other way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Republicans are perfect? Look at Richard Nixon? Fucking TREASONIST TERRORIST Bastard, that sold weapons to the CHINESE!</p>
<p>He was a FIRM Republican&#8230;there goes your argument. Also your argument that the kkk was a wing of the Democratic party is a complete lie. If you knew your history half as well as I do, you&#8217;d know that the first KKK was established by veterans of the CONFEDERATE Army, which makes sense considering the Confederate Army was largely Republican.</p>
<p>I, being a Moderate, oddly agree with your views on what the Republican Party SHOULD be, or was. Currently we are looking at a new form of divisive and corrupt politics in BOTH parties, but according to the facts that I just refuted, I look at the current Democratic party as the lesser of two evils.</p>
<p>If the GOP had remained Paleo-Conservative in Nature, I would be a Republican at this very moment, but sadly it&#8217;s seemed to have gone the other way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raise The Age To Vote! by Mr. M Sigma</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/02/28/raise-the-age-to-vote/#comment-4304</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. M Sigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/2008/02/28/raise-the-age-to-vote/#comment-4304</guid>
		<description>Obama, a "Talking suit"?
Geez, that could ONLY come from the mouth of a conservative. Ok, fi we're going talk about what one politician did/did not do, lets take a look at your God George "Dubya" Bush...

100000+ innocent civillians dead, now admits that his policy of preemptive strikes was misguided, has single-handedly wounded the constitution with military trubinals endangering the writ of habeas corpus (and his ILLEGAL policy of roving wiretaps which has endangered our right to privacy), through vague statements eluded that dissenters and activists are friends of terrorists (thus harming public discourse) and CONTINUES to disrespect the soldiers by not visiting their graves, as well as MISLEAD and LIE to the American Public.

Remember Operation Iraqi Liberation? Whats the spell, O.I.L. Far be it for me to be a moon-bat liberal, but it sounds like more then coincidence when 250 million Americans are screaming that this is a unjust war of economics. 

In short, George Bush committed an act of genocide against innocent people, under the allusion that the Iraqi/Afghani citizens committed terrorism (when in fact the hijackers were Saudis, which George has strong business ties to), and has harmed our constitution.

Meanwhile illegal no-bid contracts are being handed out to various defense-companys (one of which Cheney is STILL collecting payments from).

Now, looking ahead to the future, we see that it's either Obama, or the dreaded McCain. McCains policys are just as disasterous and greedy as Ole' Georges, and are a carbon copy of them at that!

The actions of this current Administration are unacceptable, and anyone that even SLIGHTLY associates with those policy's is just as guilty. George Bush is a terrorist is should be !*ARRESTED*! and tried for War Crimes in a Court of Law.

Frankly though, unless George exercises the powers of Executive Order 10990 and declares an emergency (eliminating all elections) and establishing a dictatorship, then the only way that the GOP will be able to *STEAL* the election this time is to change the voting age and ONCE AGAIn *DENY* Americans the changes they are DEMANDING.

That's my say on the matter, but I'm sure because this site is KKKonservative they'll be sure to censor this comment.

Btw, if the conservatives even *try* to steal the voting rights of many fresh adults, FULLY expect them to see this as a simple ploy to rob the Americans of a clear and decided election; and fully expect RIOTS, if not a lynch mob of several million outside the whitehouse ready to string the president up from a lamp post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, a &#8220;Talking suit&#8221;?<br />
Geez, that could ONLY come from the mouth of a conservative. Ok, fi we&#8217;re going talk about what one politician did/did not do, lets take a look at your God George &#8220;Dubya&#8221; Bush&#8230;</p>
<p>100000+ innocent civillians dead, now admits that his policy of preemptive strikes was misguided, has single-handedly wounded the constitution with military trubinals endangering the writ of habeas corpus (and his ILLEGAL policy of roving wiretaps which has endangered our right to privacy), through vague statements eluded that dissenters and activists are friends of terrorists (thus harming public discourse) and CONTINUES to disrespect the soldiers by not visiting their graves, as well as MISLEAD and LIE to the American Public.</p>
<p>Remember Operation Iraqi Liberation? Whats the spell, O.I.L. Far be it for me to be a moon-bat liberal, but it sounds like more then coincidence when 250 million Americans are screaming that this is a unjust war of economics. </p>
<p>In short, George Bush committed an act of genocide against innocent people, under the allusion that the Iraqi/Afghani citizens committed terrorism (when in fact the hijackers were Saudis, which George has strong business ties to), and has harmed our constitution.</p>
<p>Meanwhile illegal no-bid contracts are being handed out to various defense-companys (one of which Cheney is STILL collecting payments from).</p>
<p>Now, looking ahead to the future, we see that it&#8217;s either Obama, or the dreaded McCain. McCains policys are just as disasterous and greedy as Ole&#8217; Georges, and are a carbon copy of them at that!</p>
<p>The actions of this current Administration are unacceptable, and anyone that even SLIGHTLY associates with those policy&#8217;s is just as guilty. George Bush is a terrorist is should be !*ARRESTED*! and tried for War Crimes in a Court of Law.</p>
<p>Frankly though, unless George exercises the powers of Executive Order 10990 and declares an emergency (eliminating all elections) and establishing a dictatorship, then the only way that the GOP will be able to *STEAL* the election this time is to change the voting age and ONCE AGAIn *DENY* Americans the changes they are DEMANDING.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my say on the matter, but I&#8217;m sure because this site is KKKonservative they&#8217;ll be sure to censor this comment.</p>
<p>Btw, if the conservatives even *try* to steal the voting rights of many fresh adults, FULLY expect them to see this as a simple ploy to rob the Americans of a clear and decided election; and fully expect RIOTS, if not a lynch mob of several million outside the whitehouse ready to string the president up from a lamp post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Man Without A Party by Sky</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>I found this article on stumbleupon.  Quick question, how exactly can you say the Democrat Party was "for most of it’s history and to this day, the party of Racism and Separation?"

I'm sorry, but I don't understand where this is coming from.  I don't consider myself to be particularly educated in such things, although I have a bachelors degree in Political Science.

E-mail me,  I'd love some answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article on stumbleupon.  Quick question, how exactly can you say the Democrat Party was &#8220;for most of it’s history and to this day, the party of Racism and Separation?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I don&#8217;t understand where this is coming from.  I don&#8217;t consider myself to be particularly educated in such things, although I have a bachelors degree in Political Science.</p>
<p>E-mail me,  I&#8217;d love some answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Man Without A Party by Rey</title>
		<link>http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>In regards to statement 3, doesn't it seem difficult now to create a large enough force? I believe we should be a little more on the technological edge and use weapons at our disposal. There are reasons we manfactured the bombs.
Also, a party like this could exist, but would be cut out by the "election system" and other means by the corrupt "man".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to statement 3, doesn&#8217;t it seem difficult now to create a large enough force? I believe we should be a little more on the technological edge and use weapons at our disposal. There are reasons we manfactured the bombs.<br />
Also, a party like this could exist, but would be cut out by the &#8220;election system&#8221; and other means by the corrupt &#8220;man&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
