Archive for the ‘2008 Election Follies’ Category

8
Nov

Change

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags:

4
Nov

A Last Word Before the Returns Come In Tonight

   Posted by: Aurelius

The longest Presidential campaign in memory is now over.

Of course, the 2012 campaign starts tomorrow, regardless of the outcome tonight.

I believe that both Obama and Palin are already thinking about the next cycle, at least in concept, though the results of today’s voting will affect which one is running as the incumbent (well, VP, in Palin’s case), and which as the “rematch” candidate.

You can bet that Hillary Clinton is already putting her team together to challenge for the Democrat nomination.  I’d be surprised if Mitt Romney was not also having those planning sessions. And you can be sure that Bobby Jindal will also be looking for the GOP nod.

I suspect that it is going to be a long night, in any case.

Those of us who have lived in the Western states have long been frustrated by the skewing of national elections that comes from the news media reporting/calling Eastern and Midwestern (and Mountain) states for President, when the polls are still open in the west.

The result of having elections with National office components called while the polls are still open in the west, is the suppression of potential votes.  This affects more than just the Presidential elections, as there are always local and state issues on the ballots as well.

So, I have a suggestion for any Western Congressman and Senator who really wants to serve his constituents:  Introduce legislation to PROHIBIT any reporting of exit polls or election results from any state until the polls are closed in ALL jurisdictions.

This will annoy the media, and the residents of Dixville Notch, but will also allow the residents of western states to cast their ballots with the same sense of urgency that other citizens feel.

3
Nov

Chairman Obama Taking Quotes From Chairman Mao?

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags: ,

From Gateway Pundit:

Obama appeals to devotees in Virginia:

I feel like we got a righteous wind at our backs here, but we’re going to have to work. We’re going to have to struggle. We’re going to have to fight.

And here is an exerpt from the writings of Chairman Mao:

The ill wind of opportunism is falling, the righteous wind of socialism is on the rise.

By the end of this year the victory of socialism will be greatly assured. Naturally there will be many struggles ahead and we must struggle hard.

2
Nov

A Couple of Upsides to a Possible Obama Presidency

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags:

-> Keith Olberman and John Stewart will quickly be out of a job, without a viable target in in the White House, Senate, or House of Representatives.  Indeed, MSNBC will shortly thereafter fold as a commercially viable enterprise.

-> Stephen Colbert will be forced to broaden his scope, if he doesn’t want to share the same fate as Olberman and Stewart.

-> With no viable Republican targets, some of the Media will turn on the Socialists Democrats in power.  In extreme circumstances, they may begin to identify corrupt left wing politicians by their party affiliation.

-> With far left politicians and political hacks in charge of Everything, it will remind people of the lessons the Eastern Europeans learned under Soviet (Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist) oppression.  We may be hunting Socialists with dogs by the 2nd decade of the 21st Century.

2
Nov

Obama Wants to Bankrupt Coal Industry

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags: ,

Thanks to P.J. Gladnick, at Newsbusters:

Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview:

“Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

It’s just that it will bankrupt them.

Had the Press actually been doing it’s job this election cycle, things like this would not be news to the public.

Audio recording is available here:

29
Oct

The Second Bill of Rights

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags: , ,

(Hat tip to Scott at Powerline)

The Toledo Blade has some pieces on Obama, and FDR’s Second Bill of Rights.

Without further ado, here is that list of “rights” that the left want to append to the Constitution:

  • The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or
    shops or farms or mines of the nation;
  • The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing
    and recreation;
  • The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a
    return which will give him and his family a decent living;
  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an
    atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by
    monopolies at home or abroad;
  • The right of every family to a decent home;
  • The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to
    achieve and enjoy good health;
  • The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old
    age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
  • The right to a good education.

Amazingly, this list shares many common points with the UN Declaration on Human Rights, which I have commented on before.

And I have the same general comment – everything listed here is a Benefit, not a Right.

Benefit: 

Something that promotes or enhances well-being; an advantage: The field trip was of great benefit to the students; Help; aid.

Right:
Something that is due to a person or governmental body by law, tradition, or nature.

Your Rights are yours from birth.  No one has the power to give them to you, though they can easily be taken from you, with or without your consent.

The first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Original Bill of Rights, does not grant your rights, or even enumerate them.  It specifically prohibits the government from infringing upon several of them, that the Founders thought so fundamental that they needed to be named, including the practice of Religion, Defense, Security from the state in your person and personal effects, protection from government and judicial abuse, and most importantly, in the 9th and 10th amendments, from the Government itself.

  • Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the
states respectively, or to the people.

To reiterate,  the 9th amendment specifically states that the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are not the only rights.  The 10th amendment specifically limits the Federal government to the powers granted in the Constitution, and reserves all others to the states and people.

What the Second Bill of Rights would do is to grant Benefits.  Benefits guaranteed by the Government.  And anything granted by the state is controlled by the state, can be taken away by the state, and makes you subservient to the state.  You cannot have a benefit from the state without losing some portion of your inalienable rights.

The most insidious of the items on FDR’s list is the first.  When the State guarantees you a job, you no longer owe your allegiance to your employer, but to the state.  We see that in the Union workforce today.  Union members owe their allegiance to their Union.  The employer is almost immaterial to them.  I have known Union members in the construction industry who are dispatched to different companies, almost as though the Union was a skilled labor pool agency.  The Contractor they work for varies as projects come and go.  This amendment would destroy the worker/employer relationship throughout the economy (more than likely by making Union membership mandatory), with the State being the ultimate arbiter.

This would also have the effect of transferring control of all business to the State; since the State would be the guarantor of jobs, they would certainly move to require levels of benefits and employee (Union) representation in management.

If all this sounds somewhat familiar, it is the model followed by many failed states, most notably the Soviet Union.

Sounds good for the worker, though, right?

Well, the cost will be the loss of your right to choose where you work, who you work for, and your ability to negotiate your own compensation and job benefits. Companies will be bound to offer standardized pay and bennies for comparable work.  You will, in essence, be like the Union worker, at the Union Hall, taking the next job on the list that more or less fits your skill set.

Most of the items on the Second Bill of Rights flow from or are linked to guaranteed employment.

Of the others, two demand further discussion:

  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an
    atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by
    monopolies at home or abroad

A monopoly at home is only possible when a) the government grants it, or b) when a company has sole control of a resource (or technology) to create a product or service.  The second instance can usually be overcome by countries from outside the state.  The first instance is very easily remedied.  Stop creating government monopolies (for example, Cable and Power, and other Utility companies are usually granted monopolies pn products and services in specific areas).

Free trade makes monopolies difficult, if not impossible, aside from government action to create them.

  • The right of every family to a decent home

Ever seen Public Housing? 

There is a basic rule of human nature, that cannot be simply wished away:  People do not appreciate things that they are given, as the appreciate things that they work for.

When the state gives you a home, it is the state’s home.  You are just allowed to live there.  You have no incentive to care for the home, and the state makes the rules governing how you live in the home. 

————————————–
What the entire Second Bill of Rights does is turn a society based on Freedom and self-determination, into a society of dependent proles.

When the state cares for you from cradle to grave (or womb to the tomb, if you prefer), your are no longer free; you are a servant to the state.  The Government Of the People, For the People, and By the People, becomes the Government of, for, and by the Bureaucrat and the Political aristocracy.

When the state guarantees your job, your home, your food and clothing, your health care, your retirement, and your education, the payback will be the loss of your ability to choose these things for yourself, and the ability to improve your lot. 

We have seen this movie before.  Look at any of the countries of Eastern Europe that suffered under the yoke of Socialist domination for the last half of the 20th century.  That is the future of America if we fail to learn the lessons of history, and condemn ourselves and our children to repeat it.

Even the Chinese have learned this lesson. And as the state recedes from peoples daily lives, their economy and opportunities grow exponentially.  As economic freedom continues to grow, political freedom will follow.

It is sad to think that many in this country have lost the will strive ahead, and now want to fall back into the cold comfort of serfdom.

28
Oct

What, Exactly, Is In The Water In The Bay Area?

   Posted by: Aurelius Tags: ,

Nancy Pelosi, (prospective member of the ruling Triumvirate), was at Google’s HQ and made this point:

…on concerns that Democrats might control both the White House and Congress she said the following:

“Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from
there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have
substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more
bipartisan,” said Pelosi.

Yes, of course. 

When the Far Left wing of the Socialist Democrat has firm majorities in both houses, and hold the White House, the Republicans will be more willing than ever to work with them on moving the United States firmly leftward, until it looks like a bad copy of the Soviet Union.

I don’t know why I didn’t see that before.  It’s so clear now.

Page 1 of 712345...Last »