Archive for January, 2009

Courtesy of AFP:

US President Barack Obama’s offer to talk to Iran shows that America’s policy of “domination” has failed, the government spokesman said on Saturday.

“This request means Western ideology has become passive, that capitalist thought and the system of domination have failed,” Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency.

“Negotiation is secondary, the main issue is that there is no way but for (the United States) to change,” he added.

After nearly three decades of severed ties, Obama said shortly after taking office this month that he is willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to “unclench its fist”.

In response, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a fresh tirade against the United States, demanding an apology for its “crimes” against Iran and saying he expected “deep and fundamental” change from Obama.

Ahhh, yes, echos of the Jimmah Cahtahr administration ring in my head.

Thanks, President Obama. 

If you get tired of being treated like a little b-hotch by the Iranians, and Venezualans, and Russians, and Canadians (etc…), call Rush Limbaugh.  I’m sure he’ll be happy to give you some pointers on dealing with these guys.

In the name of bi-partisanship, of course….

Tags:

15
Jan

Obama 2.0 – Building the Party of Obama

   Posted by: Aurelius    in National

Back in October, I made the observation that:

Do I really think that Obama is trying to form a new Hitler Youth type movement?  Probably not.

But if I had to pick between Obama and McCain, as to which one was more likely to do exactly that – there is no question that it would be Obama.

Fast forward to the present, and we find out about this (courtesy of the LA Times):

The organization, known internally as “Barack Obama 2.0,” is being designed to sustain a grass-roots network of millions that was mobilized last year to elect Obama and now is widely considered the country’s most potent political machine.

Organizers and even Republicans say the scope of this permanent campaign structure is unprecedented for a president. People familiar with the plan say Obama’s team would use the network in part to pressure lawmakers — particularly wavering Democrats — to help him pass complex legislation on the economy, healthcare and energy.

Though the plan still is emerging, one source with knowledge of the internal discussion said the organization could have an annual budget of $75 million in privately raised funds. Another said it would deploy hundreds of paid staff members — possibly one for every congressional district in certain politically important states and even more in larger battlegrounds such as Florida, Ohio, Colorado, Virginia and North Carolina.

The full-time staff is likely to consist primarily of the presidential campaign workers, many in their 20s, who served as the local points of contact for the campaign’s vast network of neighborhood volunteers. As part of the new organization, these workers probably would focus on similar campaign-style tasks, such as arranging phone banks, distributing signs, recruiting more helpers, buying coffee and doughnuts for house meetings and reporting voter contact data to senior officials.

“The only way to keep this thing going is to have boots on the ground,” said a strategist familiar with the plan who spoke on condition of anonymity because campaign officials have not granted permission to talk about it.

In what would be another unprecedented step, Obama’s political staff is deciding whether to create a service organization that would use the vast corps of its grass-roots campaign supporters. As described by one source knowledgeable with the discussions, this nonprofit arm would be used to help victims of natural disasters, but would do so under the Obama umbrella while continuing to build the overall network’s massive e-mail database.

The prospect of a president being able to guide a service or relief agency outside the framework of his government is a unique development.

So we now see that the Obama is not only planning to run a perpetual campaign, but to build his own organization separate from the Democrat Party.  Think ACORN, but dedicated to Obama and his administration. 

If John McCain had won the election, and made the same move, there would have been wailing and gnashing of teeth from the Media.  The Left would have been screaming about Brownshirts and Nazis.

So, let me do the media a favor, and point out that there is a modern equivelant to what Obama wants to build:

It is called Hamas.

From Wikipedia:

Since its formation in 1987, Hamas has conducted numerous social,
political, and military actions. Its popularity stems in part from its welfare and social services to Palestinians in the occupied territories,
including school and hospital construction. The group devotes much of
its estimated $70 million annual budget to an extensive social services
network, running many relief and education programs, and funds schools,
orphanages, mosques, healthcare clinics, soup kitchens, and sports
leagues. According to the Israeli scholar Reuven Paz “approximately 90 percent of the organization’s work is in social, welfare, cultural, and educational activities”

The only difference I can see is that Hamas has a fully fledged Military wing.

Of course, that may just be a matter of time.

Tags:

11
Jan

Seattle PI – RIP

   Posted by: Aurelius    in Media, Northwest

The Seattle Post Intelligencer is up for sale.  And if there is no buyer, the print edition will be shut down in 60 days.

Personally, I am not all broken up about this.  I have little respect for most of the left wing shills (they like to be called “journalists”, but I think they and their fellow travellers are the only ones they are fooling) at this Democrat/Left Wing propoganda rag, and I am not sad to see them go, victims of their own political leanings.

What do I mean by that?

Well, as a former subscriber to the PI, when I lived in King County, it was obvious that their goal was to cater to the left wing portion of the market.  Unfortunately for them, that portion of the market does NOT cater to the advertisers that a large metro publication needs to survive.

In addition, print publications cannot provide rock solid evidence of value to an advertiser, in the way that On Line sites can (like click through data).

I think this can be proven by comparing the Tacoma News Tribune, who is financially stable.  While they lean to the left, the reporting, on the whole, is far more balanced than the PI.  They appeal to a wider demographic, and people shop with their advertisers, so the advertisers stay with them.

Having said that, just this morning my wife asked me why, if I get most of my news from Fox News and the Internet, do I still subscribe to the TNT?

The only real answer I have to that is 1) portability, and 2) the kids like the comics.  Though most of the comics aren’t even mildly entertaining.  But that’s another post.

I guess, at some point, I need to ask myself if the $10+ dollars a month I spend on the paper balances out.  For that same $10, I could get a major regional or national newspaper delivered daily to my Kindle e-reader, thus solving the portability issue.  I know that my kindle payed for itself in 6 months, by changing from paper and hard cover books to eBooks.  Maybe I should think more about changing my newspaper over as well.  With the added bonus of receiving the paper ANYWHERE in the US I happen to be that day.

But I digress.

I wish the PI luck in converting to an on-line only operation (as in this environment, I can’t imagine anyone wanting to throw away $14M a year on the PI).  But I won’t be reading it there, either.

Tags:

11
Jan

Recent Events

   Posted by: Aurelius    in General

I have been, for a number of reasons, silent for the last several weeks.

One issue was technical – I found that my Hosting company was not practicing basic security measures, and had allowed my sites to become vulnerable to various threats.  So, it became necessary to move the site to a new hosting company, with a much better reputation.  As a plus, the new firm is very supporting of Word Press blogs, and it is making my life a LOT easier from a site maintenance perspective.

On the personal front, I have been in the final stages of starting up a new company, and tying up things with my former employer.  Amazing how much time that can take up.

And finally – I decided to sit back and watch the Political situation for awhile, and see what developed.

I will be interested to see what changes of perspective and insight I gain as an entrepreneur, versus a cog of a of a large, soulless, corporate machine.

———-

I would like to note, however, that I was very unpleasantly surprised during the last election cycle at just how low the level of discourse has fallen.

While at an informal function (no-host bar, everyone somewhat lubricated)  just before the election, I allowed myself to be pulled into a political discussion.

People that I have known, and done business with for years, were actually SHOUTING at me, for daring to admit that I was voting for someone other than Obama.  This ran the spectrum from 20 somethings to one gentlemen that is in his 60s.

As I tried in vain to have a rational discussion of basic political theory, it quickly degenerated to loud voices from some, to exclusion from others.

This has event has weighed on my mind heavily for the last month or two.  I have finally decided that I must be extremely careful, going forward, to refrain from any political discussions in public – at least with people that I must work with and around.  Not for personal safety reasons; but because so many people are unable to have any sense of perspective and proportion.

It’s just an election, people.  We survived Jimmy Carter, and Richard Nixon.  We can survive Obama’s warmed over New Deal and Clinton era Retreads.

After all, I am an American first, and a Conservative Libertarian second.  If Obama succeeds, Hip Hip Hooray.  If he fails utterly, there is another election in 2010, where we can take back the Senate (and maybe the House, if its bad enough); and another Presidential election in 2012.