Archive for November 2nd, 2008

-> Keith Olberman and John Stewart will quickly be out of a job, without a viable target in in the White House, Senate, or House of Representatives.  Indeed, MSNBC will shortly thereafter fold as a commercially viable enterprise.

-> Stephen Colbert will be forced to broaden his scope, if he doesn’t want to share the same fate as Olberman and Stewart.

-> With no viable Republican targets, some of the Media will turn on the Socialists Democrats in power.  In extreme circumstances, they may begin to identify corrupt left wing politicians by their party affiliation.

-> With far left politicians and political hacks in charge of Everything, it will remind people of the lessons the Eastern Europeans learned under Soviet (Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist) oppression.  We may be hunting Socialists with dogs by the 2nd decade of the 21st Century.

Tags:

2
Nov

Obama Wants to Bankrupt Coal Industry

   Posted by: Aurelius    in 2008 Election Follies, Energy

Thanks to P.J. Gladnick, at Newsbusters:

Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview:

“Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

It’s just that it will bankrupt them.

Had the Press actually been doing it’s job this election cycle, things like this would not be news to the public.

Audio recording is available here:

Tags: ,