Comments on: A Man Without A Party http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/ News and Views From Frederickson Washington Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:28:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Aurelius http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/comment-page-1/#comment-4307 Aurelius Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:51:29 +0000 http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4307 Sigma: A - Nixon was a RINO at best; who opened relations with China; but it was Clinton that sold them Weapons tech. B - I wont comment on the KKK being "Republican", or the Confederates army being Republican. Please check your facts, and get back to me, as every reference I see contradicts you. C - There is nothing "moderate" about the modern Democrat party. They are Marxist at the very, and, I suspect, Stalinist deep down. Happy to discuss this point with you. Sigma:

A - Nixon was a RINO at best; who opened relations with China; but it was Clinton that sold them Weapons tech.

B - I wont comment on the KKK being “Republican”, or the Confederates army being Republican. Please check your facts, and get back to me, as every reference I see contradicts you.

C - There is nothing “moderate” about the modern Democrat party. They are Marxist at the very, and, I suspect, Stalinist deep down. Happy to discuss this point with you.

]]> By: Mr. M Sigma http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/comment-page-1/#comment-4305 Mr. M Sigma Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:51:57 +0000 http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4305 And Republicans are perfect? Look at Richard Nixon? Fucking TREASONIST TERRORIST Bastard, that sold weapons to the CHINESE! He was a FIRM Republican...there goes your argument. Also your argument that the kkk was a wing of the Democratic party is a complete lie. If you knew your history half as well as I do, you'd know that the first KKK was established by veterans of the CONFEDERATE Army, which makes sense considering the Confederate Army was largely Republican. I, being a Moderate, oddly agree with your views on what the Republican Party SHOULD be, or was. Currently we are looking at a new form of divisive and corrupt politics in BOTH parties, but according to the facts that I just refuted, I look at the current Democratic party as the lesser of two evils. If the GOP had remained Paleo-Conservative in Nature, I would be a Republican at this very moment, but sadly it's seemed to have gone the other way... And Republicans are perfect? Look at Richard Nixon? Fucking TREASONIST TERRORIST Bastard, that sold weapons to the CHINESE!

He was a FIRM Republican…there goes your argument. Also your argument that the kkk was a wing of the Democratic party is a complete lie. If you knew your history half as well as I do, you’d know that the first KKK was established by veterans of the CONFEDERATE Army, which makes sense considering the Confederate Army was largely Republican.

I, being a Moderate, oddly agree with your views on what the Republican Party SHOULD be, or was. Currently we are looking at a new form of divisive and corrupt politics in BOTH parties, but according to the facts that I just refuted, I look at the current Democratic party as the lesser of two evils.

If the GOP had remained Paleo-Conservative in Nature, I would be a Republican at this very moment, but sadly it’s seemed to have gone the other way…

]]> By: Sky http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/comment-page-1/#comment-4265 Sky Wed, 21 May 2008 20:46:55 +0000 http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4265 I found this article on stumbleupon. Quick question, how exactly can you say the Democrat Party was "for most of it’s history and to this day, the party of Racism and Separation?" I'm sorry, but I don't understand where this is coming from. I don't consider myself to be particularly educated in such things, although I have a bachelors degree in Political Science. E-mail me, I'd love some answers. I found this article on stumbleupon. Quick question, how exactly can you say the Democrat Party was “for most of it’s history and to this day, the party of Racism and Separation?”

I’m sorry, but I don’t understand where this is coming from. I don’t consider myself to be particularly educated in such things, although I have a bachelors degree in Political Science.

E-mail me, I’d love some answers.

]]> By: Rey http://paxamerica.com/2008/05/18/a-man-without-a-party/comment-page-1/#comment-4263 Rey Sun, 18 May 2008 16:53:07 +0000 http://paxamerica.com/?p=127#comment-4263 In regards to statement 3, doesn't it seem difficult now to create a large enough force? I believe we should be a little more on the technological edge and use weapons at our disposal. There are reasons we manfactured the bombs. Also, a party like this could exist, but would be cut out by the "election system" and other means by the corrupt "man". In regards to statement 3, doesn’t it seem difficult now to create a large enough force? I believe we should be a little more on the technological edge and use weapons at our disposal. There are reasons we manfactured the bombs.
Also, a party like this could exist, but would be cut out by the “election system” and other means by the corrupt “man”.

]]>